Abbot spent 2 years studying sculpture in Berlin and Paris and like many
who transformed from one art to another was initially hired as a dark room
assistant impressing her mentor, Eugene Atget, so much that he allowed her
to use his studio for her own photographic work.
Sebastio Salgado started as an architectural photographer and moved into
landscape producing images of locations mostly untouched by modern man but
filled with emotional content. This is the goal to achieve with all photography
and one that Clive White has kindly reminded me of in the OCA student forum.
Using a large format camera she took black and white images of New
York’s changing city skyline in the 1930’s and of the neighbourhoods that got
destroyed to make way recording this with the high attention to detail that she
had learned and admired about Eugene Atget’s work.
Interestingly I read that she chose her camera
angles and lenses to create compositions that either stabilised a subject (if
she approved of it), or destabilised it (if she scorned it). In this way her
photography would not have been pure documentary but I would think very much
influenced by her own personal views.
Abbot at the time was part of a “straight
photography movement” which stressed the non-manipulation of photographs. Digital post processing still brings
with it much discussion and debate.
An interesting article identified by an OCA
colleague highlights the perils of post processing images where the winner of a
prestigious photography competition was tripped of his title of Landscape
Photographer of the year where it appears disgruntled fellow competitors
pointed out the image had been photoshopped. Interestingly from my own investigations
it appears photoshopping was allowed per the competition rules and nothing
detailed about how heavy an image could be photoshopped. It drew interesting
debate in the FaceBook OCA Level 1 Group
It would
have been interesting had Abbott also had the opportunity to move into digital
photography like Don McCullin has at age 77. In the
you tube clip with McCullin he appears to accept Ascough’s view that it can
make up for digital camera’s sensor inability to capture what the eye see’s and
that the photographers original vision can be better replicated.
A small sample of Abbott’s images are detailed
below:
Here is
a link to Abbot’s New York images:
Some
images seem complete buildings, somewhat distant but exampling New York’s
changing skyline and do not reflect buildings in use and perhaps this is her
intention in that they look unemotional and distant from human usage, her destabilising
of the images. However others, perhaps those that were replaced by these
buildings show user interaction or appear to have signs of human usage and for
me draw me into the image as each appears to have a story and connect much more
with me. Its an interesting approach and I begin to understand how a personal
viewpoint can be integrated within an image and one’s feeling and viewpoint can
be expressed in this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment